Thanks for the write up. Very clearly outlined. I would definitely favour the low fees high growth approach. My only concern is that whatever approach is decided, that it is a long term approach. Talk of “raising fees later” in some of the comments actually presents a risk to projects considering adopting RENVM . Personally I feel that the fee movements and threat of fee changes has damaged adoption to date. Of course - fees should be able to change but very infrequently and by very small amounts. That way adopting projects can be certain of costs associated with using RENVM. JMHO