To address points and questions brought up by @Arviee , @Maggie , @davoice321 at once:
Whenever there is a mint, burn, or burn-and-mint by any application on any chain or subnet, those fees go to the darknodes, doesn’t matter if the application is on a subnet. So the concept of missing out on a ‘juicy’ subnet doesn’t make sense because you are still earning from its cross-chain activity. The extra subnet incentives are for the computational resources that occur as applications on it are interacted with users causing state changes, like a gas fee, and could in practice be much smaller than what the regular darknodes earn with the 5-20 BPS on cross-chain transfers we have currently.
In theory we want the costs for running multichain apps on Ren (through subnets in this example) to be low, to support as many applications as possible. It shouldn’t be an aim to extract as much money as possible from those deploying apps on Ren in the form of the computational costs, since then they will just go somewhere else. We should aim to make it as easy as possible for them to settle cross-chain transactions using Ren, as that brings the cross-chain volume, which rewards DNOs.