- Why would Subnets be allowed to define additional (optional) bonding requirements if the Darknode bond is used to protect both networks (Core and Subnet)? Couldn’t the Darknode be slashed if it misbehaves within the Subnet? (Further questions on misbehaving below)
- Can you define the overall lifecycle of a Subnet (leads into my next question)?
- What happens to the assets “stored” on a Subnet if all Subnet nodes leave? I know they’ll still be custodied by the Core Network - would the Core Network have a ledger of where assets live and who they belong to on each Subnet? If so, I assume when a Subnet is removed, assets are assigned to their original owners which could then be able to move to other Subnets / leave Ren?
a. Real world example: assume I have 1 BTC on Catalog (which would be deployed on an EVM Subnet). For some reason, all Subnet Nodes leave the EVM Subnet and it is removed on the next epoch. Where would my 1 BTC end up? Or rather, how would I access my BTC?
- Can you expand on what is means for a Subnet Node to cheat? What actions are considered cheating? What could a Subnet Node gain by cheating?
- How are Subnets allowed to change their Subnet Node requirements? Couldn’t a bad actor come in and change the requirements such that they are the sole operator and cheat how they want?