Thanks again everyone for helping push this through and participating in the debate!
My position is still as before. I’m in favor of option 3 to make no change to the bonding requirements and provide no airdrop:
- Simple, least hassle and complexity for the protocol going forward
- I think it is unfair to let token holders bear the burden of inflation while protecting operators
- Benefits decentralization down the line by not penalizing would-be operators/those who are not bonded
- Even with increased bond there is no guarantee that operators won’t still be diluted in their income, because of the inflation there will likely be more operators anyways
- Using an airdrop to compensate operators at the expense of token holders is a bad image imo, would prefer not to start 2.0 in that way
I’m starting to feel like a broken record listing my reasoning over and over again so I’ve kept it to a quick summary. For more of a deep dive I’ll refer to the first couple of posts in the RFC, I think its captured quite well and eloquently there.