Ren Governance Process

This living document outlines the governance process for advancing Ren improvements, particularly:

  • How to proceed when you have an idea that is relevant for the Ren community to consider
  • Posting a Request For Comment (RFC) and making sure it gets a fair consideration by the community
  • How an RFC may transition into an Ren Improvement Proposal (RIP)
  • How support or opposition is evaluated for a RIP
  • How a supported RIP is enacted

The Ren project is young and will be developing and changing over time, so any details outlined in this document are subject to change. For instance, the REN token is not used for voting at this moment, but before the transition to Phase Zero we will likely begin implementing that to some degree. Until that time, governance will be carried out less formally in this forum, with the team monitoring and making sure that governance is carried out appropriately, and that ideas or proposals get fair treatment. The community will gradually handle more and more of the governance process over time.

Why do we need governance?

The Ren project aims to be the leading decentralized universal interoperability protocol in the crypto ecosystem. To fulfill this goal we need to constantly anticipate market demands and technological shifts, to support the platforms users and developers want, and to provide the best user experience when interacting with RenVM in general. We also need to balance making the network as secure as possible while we remain true to decentralization and permissionless-ness. For this we will need an active decentralized organisation governing the development of the Ren project, which for instance includes managing what the transaction fees in RenVM should be, and which new platforms that should be integrated into RenVM. This means that the Ren community, the core developers, and external projects interacting or intending to interact with RenVM, need to work together to shape the development of the Ren project.

We encourage everyone interested to take active part in governance, shaping the future of Universal Interoperability.

Step 1: You have an idea, proposal, or want to raise a discussion that is relevant to the Ren project

Proposals that aim to change something about the Ren project, either the protocol itself or the governance of the protocol, typically go from being discussed in a Request For Comment (RFC) thread, to a Ren Improvement Proposal (RIP). In the RFC, the idea/proposal is worked out or rejected, and if the community agrees that the finalized proposal is worthy to be formally voted on, it transitions into a RIP. But before you want to post your idea/proposal as an RFC (or in some cases directly as a RIP), it makes sense to chat with community members informally or posting in the “General” category on the forum, to sanity check whether it is worth to take precious attentional resources from the community and core team. This is because every RFC/RIP will be considered seriously and deeply as we care about the development of the Ren project, as new ideas are necessary to keep a project developing.

If you feel confident that your idea is worthy attention, feel free to post it in the RFC category on the forum (or in some cases as a RIP directly), carefully following the details laid out articles describing how to post an RFC.

Step 2: Posting an RFC

What is an RFC:

When you feel confident to post an RFC, do so and moderators on the forum will review it in a timely fashion to make sure it follows the laid out format.

Step 3: Making sure an RFC gets a fair consideration from the community

To make sure an RFC gets a fair consideration from the community, stay active in the thread and engage with the people that comment and ask questions about the idea. Also feel free to post a link to the RFC in the main Telegram channels for Ren so that people who don’t visit the forum every day might see it quicker. Also, give the community time to consider the proposal, as some ideas require more thought and or require more research, before having a good enough grasp on it to be able to comment on it. Having an RFC up for at least a week, before pushing it into a RIP, or dropping it, is recommended.

Step 4: Summarizing the findings in the discussions in an RFC thread and deciding whether to rework the proposal or push it through as a RIP

As the original poster of an RFC, it is prudent to summarize the discussions when it is appropriate to do so, to make it easier for the community to follow the discussions that have been had about the proposal (someone else involved in the discussion is also free to summarize). Creating a summary is a good way to reflect on whether the RFC is mature enough, and accepted by the community, to formally push it as a RIP that would be voted on. If it is found in the summary that there are many details still unclear about the proposal, or that a large part of the community reject the idea fundamentally, keep the community engaged in discussions if you think it can be worked out, otherwise you can leave it be.

What is required for an RFC to transition into a RIP:

Step 5: Posting a RIP

What is a RIP:

A RIP does not always have to have been developed as an RFC earlier:

When you feel confident to post a RIP (following the considerations in Step 4), do so and moderators on the forum will review it in a timely fashion to make sure it follows the laid out format. A RIP does not have to be posted by the original poster of the typically preceding RFC, it can be posted by someone else involved in the discussion, or by someone from the core Ren team.

For the time being the Ren team will have a veto ability to prevent a RIP being posted, which will be used if the Ren team thinks the proposal could hurt the Ren project financially, reputationally, security-wise, or in other ways.

Step 6: Evaluating the results of the RIP vote

Each RIP will include a poll, with a ‘yes’ option, a ‘no’ option, and an ‘abstain’ option. Only members with trust level 2 are allowed to vote (known community members who have not progressed to trust level 2 automatically by the forum can manually be bumped up by asking one of the moderators).

For the time being, the results of the RIP vote will be evaluated at the discretion of the core Ren team.

Step 7: If the RIP is accepted by a supermajority

A RIP that has passed will be handled by the Ren team in a timely fashion depending on the size of the change given in the RIP.